Ayana Renewable Power One Private Limited, a solar power company, has successfully secured a ruling in its favor regarding compensation for increased tax expenses incurred due to legislative changes. The company, operating a 300 MW solar power project in Rajasthan, faced financial challenges after the central and state tax rates on solar equipment were raised from 2.5% to 6%. The company argued that these tax hikes were unforeseen and significantly impacted their project costs, leading them to file a petition for compensation.
The respondents in this case, the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI) and Madhya Pradesh Power Management Company Limited, were involved due to their roles in the power purchase agreements (PPAs) and the distribution of power in Madhya Pradesh.
After reviewing the arguments and documentation, the tribunal ruled in favor of Ayana Renewable Power. It recognized the tax changes as an event of legislative change as defined in the PPA. The tribunal directed the respondents to compensate Ayana Renewable Power for the additional tax expenses incurred, ensuring the financial equilibrium of the contract was maintained as if the tax change had not occurred. The compensation amount will be confirmed through a reconciliation process supported by verified documentation.
The legal proceedings centered around notifications from the Ministry of Finance and the Rajasthan Government, which revised tax rates on solar power equipment. Ayana Renewable Power argued these revisions constituted a “Change in Law” under the terms of their PPA. According to the agreement, any legislative changes that adversely affected the financial dynamics of the project would entitle the affected party to seek compensation.
The tribunal evaluated whether the tax revisions directly impacted the project’s financial structure and if the increased costs should be compensated by the other contracting parties. The legal framework of the agreement allowed for such a review, considering any increase in expenditure due to legislative changes beyond the control of the power generator for compensation.
In their detailed review, the tribunal concluded that the increased taxes met the criteria of a Change in Law as per the PPA, directly impacting the project’s financial structure. This decision was based on the terms defining a Change in Law event and the stipulations for compensation in such instances.
SECI and the Madhya Pradesh Power Management Company were instructed to adjust their financial accounts to offset the additional tax burden placed on Ayana Renewable Power. This directive ensures that the company does not suffer financial losses due to changes in law occurring after the PPA’s signing. The tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to contractual agreements and mechanisms within those agreements to address unforeseen legal and financial changes.
The compensation includes not only the immediate tax payments but also carrying costs, reinforcing the need to restore Ayana Renewable Power’s financial status to what it would have been without the tax changes. This ruling sets a precedent for managing contractual obligations amid changing legal landscapes, particularly in the energy sector where government policies and tax rates can significantly affect project economics.
Please view the document here for more details.
Discover more from SolarQuarter
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.





















