Reading Time: 8 minutes
|In this article, some practices that need to be avoided for the best Solar O&M service. Read below for 10 such critical practices.|
The angle at which the pyranometer is installed should be the same as the tilt at which solar panels are installed to find the PR ratio (=Specific Energy Output/Radiation per sq m per day). Many times, the angle of the Pyranometer is changed so that less radiation falls on it as a result of which, the input of the Pyranometer reduces, and therefore PR increases. Other than this, pyranometers must be cleaned regularly but this practice is not followed everywhere. As a result, the dust gets settled on the glass and less radiation falls on the Pyranometer. This again results in faulty radiation data and affects its PR ratio. Abnormally high PR (>85%) is an indication that the pyranometer may not be recording correct radiation.
2. Ignoring safety measures on-site
The site team often ignores safety measures while performing O&M activities and risks their lives. Technicians may not be wearing all safety gear like helmets, shoes, working gloves, working jackets, etc. For instance, if a cable is broken and needs to be fixed, the technician may not use insulated tools or rubber gloves or goggles. If the cables are live, they might injure the technician involved in the process and can even be cause for death.
3. Lack of Proactive Testing
SCADA and monitoring software used in O&M have their own limitations and do not give the developer an understanding of the module level defects in the plant. Many times, critical damages like cell cracks, hotspots, PID or even module and string isolations can go unidentified for long periods. Therefore, it is important that the O&M team conducts periodic testing of the modules – including IV curve measurements, EL imaging, and drone-based thermography.
|4. Improper handling of cables|
The cables in the solar power plants are located under the modules very near to the ground surface. These plants are in open areas where there’s a lot of vegetation Over time, these cables hide inside the thick bushes and this causes difficulty in O&M of the cables.
Many times, it has also been observed that the cables are dangling and not laid properly in the conduits. This can possibly invite multiple ground faults and is a safety risk.
|5. Improper labeling of Cables|
When a plant is established, all the cables are labeled for future reference and data is fed in SCADA accordingly. As time progresses, many labels get damaged or disrupted, as a result of which, whenever a fault occurs on the cables, it becomes quite difficult to identify the cable and resolve the issue. If the cables are labeled correctly, the resolving process takes around 1-2 hours which might extend to 2-3 days if labeling is not proper. Therefore it is important that the labels be restored periodically.
|6. Improper Cleaning Frequency and Methodology|
Key problems with cleaning
- In some places, cleaning is done during peak hours. This practice is detrimental for the modules because during peak generation hours, the temperature of the modules is very high and the cold water will cause this high temperature to fall quickly, leading to thermal stress.
- Cleaning frequency and methodology should be derived from the nature of soiling observed on the site. For this, soiling loss measurement can be done at regular intervals. For example, High TDS level could lead to scaling of modules; Sticky dust might need cleaning with IPA solution.
- Mopping from the edges to remove dust deposition near the frame may not be done properly which reduces effective transmission on the module.
- Uneven soiling occurs if there is no proper cleaning.
- Discoloration might occur due to the cleaning of modules with hard water.
- The cleaning of modules may be done with brushes and hard detergents which leave scratches on the modules.
|7. Improper Module Handling|
The workers involved in cleaning the modules may damage the modules by kneeling, dropping other equipment, walking or climbing on the modules, leading to micro-cracks.
|8. Improper Collection of Plant data|
For preventive maintenance of the plant, certain data sets need to be collected and analyzed at varying frequencies. For instance, daily global horizontal irradiance, maximum DC/AC power, generation start and stop time, DC power generated at strings should be collected on a daily basis while net energy generated at the inverter, net energy fed at the meter, normalized energy generated, monthly DC energy loss are calculated on monthly basis. Some data is also collected on a yearly basis like annual average performance ratio, annual average plant availability, avoided CO2 consumption, etc. It has been seen that this data is not maintained in plants and therefore many problems may not be detected in a timely manner. This is one of the major practices in O&M that needs to be corrected for the proper functioning of solar power plants and increasing the plant lifespan.
|9. Inadequate Inventory Available|
Inadequate inventory can prolong the downtime as the site team may not have the right materials to fix a problem. Since most plants are located at remote locations, the restoration of inventory may take a longer time, hence leading to a longer breakdown. Certain equipment and components are a must, however, it is a common observation that these components either may not be present at the site or may not be available in sufficient quantities. Some of the critical inventories are MC4 connectors, string cables, string fuse, inverter dc fuse, etc.
|10. Preventive Maintenance not based on proper Root Cause Analysis|
When an issue is detected by the O&M teams, it is often resolved on a short-term basis and the O&M teams fail to build a preventive plan based on proper root cause analysis, which sometimes further escalates the problem. An example of this is a plant in Rajasthan where the module mounting structures did not provide a scope of expansion to the modules. As a result, the frame of the modules started bulging due to excessive heat in the region, causing moisture penetration within the modules, reduces insulation resistance and repeated tripping of the inverters In order to resolve this issue, the O&M teams bypassed the GFDI to prevent the tripping of inverters instead of solving the problem of insulation resistance and module expansion. By-passing GFDI further led to excessive Potential Induced Degradation in the plant leading to power loss. A preventive plan based on proper root cause analysis could have reduced this power loss significantly.
To conclude, O&M is not just grass-cutting, cleaning, and security. O&M is responsible for maintaining overall plant efficiency and energy delivery along with minimizing losses in the plant. It ensures ease of operations, safety, and reliability of equipment involved in the plant. With certainly added care during O&M, the plant lifespan can be increased significantly.
About PV Diagnostics
We are a team of IIT Bombay graduates experts in diagnostics of solar power plants, quality control of modules for newly commissioned solar power plants and freshly procured modules. We provide end-to-end health check-up of solar power plants. The core focus of our studies is the performance turn-around for solar assets. We possess state of the art technology to diagnose plants including portable (hand-held) EL imaging and drone-based thermography. We also work with multiple investors and asset management companies on technical due diligence.
This article has been contributed by PV Diagnostics. The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own, and do not necessarily reflect those held by SolarQuarter.