Sineng
UPEX 2026

CSERC Clarifies Tariff Rules On Zero Contract Demand, Restores Industrial HV-4 Category in Chhattisgarh

1
236
Representational image. Credit: Canva

The Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission (CSERC) has issued an important order in Petition No. 55 of 2025 regarding the tariff classification of an industrial consumer that reduced its contract demand to zero. The case was filed by M/s Real Ispat & Energy Pvt. Ltd., an integrated steel plant located in Baloda Bazar district, against the state distribution company, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited (CSPDCL).

The dispute started after the company commissioned a 20 MW Waste Heat Recovery Boiler (WHRB) captive power plant. After setting up the captive unit, the company reduced its contract demand with CSPDCL from 1000 KVA to zero in September 2024. Following this change, CSPDCL reclassified the plant from the โ€œHV 4-Steel Industriesโ€ category to the โ€œHV 7-Start-up Powerโ€ category.

CSPDCL argued that the HV-4 category applies only to industries with active contract demand for manufacturing activities. According to the utility, once the contract demand was reduced to zero, the consumer could not remain under the industrial tariff category. It further stated that the HV-7 category is meant for generating stations that draw electricity from the grid for start-up or standby purposes.

Also Read  NTPC Green Energy Commissions 125 MW Solar Capacity At Bhadla, Boosting Renewable Portfolio

However, the petitioner challenged this decision. The company stated that it continues to operate as a steel manufacturing unit and remains an industrial consumer, even after installing a captive power plant. It argued that the HV-7 tariff is specifically designed for generators during start-up, whereas it draws grid power only as a standby supply to maintain production when its captive plant is not generating sufficient electricity.

While examining the matter, the Commission first rejected CSPDCLโ€™s objection on maintainability. It clarified that the issue was not a simple billing dispute but related to proper tariff categorization. The Commission also observed that the petitionerโ€™s captive plant is not a conventional thermal power plant that requires separate start-up power. Instead, it generates electricity by using hot flue gases from its sponge iron kiln.

The Commission concluded that the HV-7 start-up tariff is meant only for a limited duration required to start a generator and cannot be applied to regular industrial load. Since the petitioner is a legally agreed-upon consumer, treating its power drawal as โ€œeventual drawalโ€ under the generator category was found to be incorrect.

Also Read  TERI and NABARD Conclude Three-Day Climate Finance Training to Strengthen Rural Development and Renewable Energy Investment in India

Accordingly, CSERC directed CSPDCL to restore the companyโ€™s classification under the โ€œHV 4-Steel Industriesโ€ category. The utility has also been ordered to revise all monthly energy bills issued from September 1, 2024, and apply standby charges as per the applicable tariff orders for any power drawn under the zero contract demand arrangement.


Discover more from SolarQuarter

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

1 COMMENT

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.