In a recent hearing before the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission in Gandhinagar, an application by Onix Trans Power Private Limited sought permission to reallocate approvals granted for a 30 MW Wind-Solar Hybrid Project to develop a purely solar project. The application was filed under Sections 86(1)(f) and 86(1)(k) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The petitioner also requested an extension for completing the project due to challenges posed by Ministry of Defence (MoD) guidelines that identified the project site as a “No Wind Turbine Generator Zone.”
Represented by counsel, Onix Trans Power explained that the projectโs initial approvals were granted based on a feasibility study and that subsequent restrictions imposed by the MoD significantly hindered its progress. The petitioner highlighted the absence of a clear timeline or process for obtaining the required No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the MoD. They further requested the Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Limited (GETCO) to extend project deadlines and prevent the encashment of a bank guarantee submitted earlier for the projectโs connectivity.
The Commission queried the petitioner on multiple aspects, including the timeline for applying to the MoD and the specifics of project activities undertaken so far. Onix Trans Power committed to filing detailed responses on these issues, including the proportion of wind and solar capacity envisaged initially and the steps taken toward project execution.
Respondents included GETCO, the Gujarat Energy Development Agency, and the MoD, each presenting their positions. GETCO pointed out procedural lapses by the petitioner, such as delays in seeking approvals and fulfilling obligations. The MoD confirmed that the project location falls under a “No WTG Zone,” restricting wind turbine installations.
The Commission directed the petitioner to submit comprehensive documentation on communications, project activities, and other relevant details within a week. Additionally, it clarified that no stay could be granted on the encashment of the bank guarantee without evaluating the matter on merit.
The case, scheduled for its next hearing on December 18, 2024, underscores the complexities in aligning renewable energy development with regulatory and defense-related constraints. The outcome will determine the projectโs feasibility and the scope of permissions granted for similar initiatives.
Discover more from SolarQuarter
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



















