BRE Summit Sineng
NewsPolicy & RegulationsUPERC Dismisses UPPCL Petition Over Power Supply And Banking Agreement In Uttar...

UPERC Dismisses UPPCL Petition Over Power Supply And Banking Agreement In Uttar Pradesh

The Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (UPERC) has dismissed a petition filed by Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited (UPPCL) seeking approval for power supply and banking arrangements involving Grasim Industries Limited (GIL) and Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (PuVVNL).

AUXSOL

The petition, numbered 2408 of 2026, sought approval for a Supplementary Tripartite Power Supply & Banking Agreement executed on March 30, 2026, between UPPCL, GIL and PuVVNL. UPPCL also requested approval to extend the original tripartite agreement from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2029, and to apply the provisions of the UPERC (Captive and Renewable Energy) Regulations, 2024.

ReNew

The original tripartite agreement was executed on February 3, 2021, for banking of electricity generated from GIL’s captive generating station. The matter was heard by the Commission on September 17, 2026.

During its examination, UPERC identified several procedural and technical issues in the petition. The Commission observed that provisions related to electricity banking had been incorporated into the Supplementary Tripartite Agreement even though a separate Banking Agreement was already in place. According to the Commission, this resulted in duplication and created ambiguity regarding the contractual arrangements.

UPERC also raised concerns over the classification of the generating facility. It noted that Annexure-A of the Banking Agreement executed on January 31, 2026, described the facility only as a “Captive Co-Generation” plant. However, it did not clarify whether the plant was based on renewable energy or non-renewable energy.

The Commission observed that this distinction was important because the UPERC (Captive and Renewable Energy) Regulations, 2024 prescribe different provisions depending on the category of the generating plant. In the absence of clear information about the source and classification of the plant, UPERC said it could not determine the applicable banking provisions.

Also Read  Philippines DOE Reports Normal Power Supply Outlook As 51 Projects Reach Completion Under Task Force 200

Based on these issues, the Commission dismissed Petition No. 2408 of 2026. However, it issued directions to UPPCL to address the deficiencies before seeking regulatory approval again.

UPPCL has been directed to execute a revised Banking Agreement based on the standard format approved by UPERC and available on the Commission’s website. The power corporation has also been asked to prepare and submit a Draft Model Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) applicable to Non-RE plants for examination by the Commission.

After the revised PPA is executed between the concerned parties, UPPCL will have to file a fresh petition seeking regulatory approval in accordance with Regulation 7 of the UPERC CRE Regulations, 2024.


Discover more from SolarQuarter

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

RELATED ARTICLES

Subscribe Today

GET EXCLUSIVE FULL ACCESS TO PREMIUM CONTENT

SUPPORT CLEANTECH JOURNALISM

EXPERT ANALYSIS OF AND EMERGING TRENDS

TOPICAL VIDEO WEBINARS

Get unlimited access to our EXCLUSIVE Content and our archive of subscriber stories.

Exclusive content this week

Latest article

More articles

- Advertisement -Newspaper WordPress Theme