Sineng
NewsPolicy & RegulationsBERC Seeks Clarifications From Bihar Discoms, ECR On Open Access Charges Dispute

BERC Seeks Clarifications From Bihar Discoms, ECR On Open Access Charges Dispute

The Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission (BERC) has directed South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. (SBPDCL), North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. (NBPDCL), and East Central Railway (ECR) to submit written clarifications on key technical and financial issues by September 9, 2026. The direction was issued on September 1 during proceedings in Case No. 02/2023.

Growatt

The case relates to a dispute over Long-Term Open Access and the issuance of No-Objection Certificates (NOCs) by Bihar State Power Transmission Company Ltd. (BSPTCL). The state distribution companies have also sought permission to recover Open Access-related charges from ECR, including Cross-Subsidy Surcharge (CSS), arrears and applicable interest.

During the hearing, the Commission examined responses connected with an Interlocutory Application filed by SBPDCL and NBPDCL on August 31, 2026. BERC has now asked the parties to provide detailed written responses on several issues before the next hearing.

One key issue concerns captive status. The petitioners have been asked to clarify whether they have obtained the mandatory year-wise captive status certificates from the designated authority as required under the Electricity Rules.

The Commission has also sought clarification on the interest applicable to outstanding amounts. ECR has questioned the use of a 1.25% Late Payment Surcharge (LPS) under the Open Access Regulations instead of the 1.5% Delayed Payment Surcharge (DPS) provided under annual tariff orders.

Another issue involves the Deviation Settlement Mechanism (DSM). The DISCOMs have been directed to respond to ECR’s contention that Cross-Subsidy Surcharge should be calculated only after separately accounting for energy settled through DSM.

Also Read  UPERC Dismisses UPRVUNL Petition Seeking BESS Framework For Thermal Power Plants In Uttar Pradesh

The Commission also considered an oral request from the petitioners seeking interim payment of 50% of the billed amount. ECR has been asked to submit a written explanation on why an appropriate portion of the disputed amount should not be paid provisionally until the matter is finally settled.

BERC further directed the parties to follow the requirements set out in paragraph 72 of the Supreme Court’s order in Civil Appeal No. 4652-4659 of 2024. Under the direction, the distribution companies must provide ECR with detailed and disaggregated calculations of outstanding CSS, specifying the supply area and relevant period. ECR must then be provided four to eight weeks to examine and respond to the calculations.

The Commission has also encouraged senior officials from the concerned parties to hold direct discussions and seek an amicable settlement. Minutes of these meetings are to be submitted to BERC for consideration.

The next hearing in the matter is scheduled for September 16, 2026, at 11:30 AM.


Discover more from SolarQuarter

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

RELATED ARTICLES

Subscribe Today

GET EXCLUSIVE FULL ACCESS TO PREMIUM CONTENT

SUPPORT CLEANTECH JOURNALISM

EXPERT ANALYSIS OF AND EMERGING TRENDS

TOPICAL VIDEO WEBINARS

Get unlimited access to our EXCLUSIVE Content and our archive of subscriber stories.

Exclusive content this week

UPCOMING EVENTS

Latest article

More articles

- Advertisement -Newspaper WordPress Theme